Creative practice is the work
From Creative Work to Creative Authority is not a slogan. It is the arc of a movement that quietly crossed a threshold in 2025. When the Creative Women’s Association (CWA) officially launched in September this year, it did not arrive with spectacle or noise. It arrived with evidence, frameworks, policy architecture, and a body of work already shaping national conversations. In just three months, CWA moved from being a collective grounded in creative practice to a recognised authority influencing workforce reform, economic policy, and systems design across arts, health, and social infrastructure.
The dominant narrative has long positioned creative work — particularly women’s creative work — as discretionary. Personal. Secondary. Something pursued for meaning rather than income, wellbeing rather than structure, expression rather than economic value. When creative workers struggle, exit, or burn out, the story quietly frames this as individual failure rather than structural design fault. The system responds with short-term grants, project cycles, and participation programs — not with pathways, standards, or workforce architecture.
CWA was established precisely to challenge that framing. Across twelve formal documents lodged between September and December 2025 — including national policy submissions, Senate Estimates questions, ministerial briefs, a full data dashboard, a Treasury-ready New Policy Proposal, and a comprehensive Case for Support — CWA made a clear and evidence-based case: Australia does not have a creativity problem. It has a system design problem.
Women comprise the majority of Australia’s creative labour force. They also perform the majority of unpaid labour and primary care. Yet there is no national certification framework for creative labour, no recognised workforce category, no procurement pathway, and no provenance system that allows creative work to be treated as legible economic activity. The result is predictable and measurable: underemployment, income volatility, workforce attrition peaking between ages 35 and 55, and creative labour displaced into health and crisis systems rather than supported through workforce infrastructure.
CWA reframes the issue at its source. It proposes the formal establishment of a new national sector — Arts & Provenance — and positions Soft Infrastructure as the missing layer within Australia’s economic and workforce systems. It introduces Applied Creative Intelligence as a professional capability framework and places certification, standards, inspection, provenance, and data governance at the centre of reform. This is not an arts funding proposal. It is a workforce and productivity intervention aligned with Treasury, employment, health, gender equality, and regional development priorities.
What is striking is not only the scope of this work, but the pace. In under three months, CWA placed formal questions on the Senate Estimates record, aligned its model with the Creative Workforce Scoping Study and Revive, produced original indices that do not exist elsewhere in Australia — including the Domestic & Care Load (DCL) Index — and demonstrated a credible, internationally grounded model adapted from proven precedent such as the Harris Tweed Authority.
Yet none of this began as policy. It began where most structural change begins: with women doing the work anyway. Women using creative practice as regulation, as income, as care, as meaning, as sovereignty. Women integrating creativity into daily life not as indulgence, but as necessity — as mothers, carers, professionals, and makers operating within systems that were never designed to recognise their contribution.
At CWA, we hold a simple truth: keep planting the seeds.
One day, you will wake up surrounded by the garden you worked for.
Creative practice — repeated, embodied, and sustained — does not disappear. When it is recognised, protected, and governed, it becomes the infrastructure we stand on.
As CWA moves into 2026, the focus shifts from establishment to scale. The goals are clear: progressing Treasury costing for national workforce infrastructure; piloting certification across multiple creative disciplines; embedding provenance and standards into procurement and commissioning pathways; expanding workforce and economic data capability; and supporting more women to step into recognised trades, certified practice, and independent, sovereign creative and economic power.
This is not about rescuing women from precarity. It is about correcting a structural omission that has existed for decades. Creative Authority is what emerges when practice is formalised, labour is recognised, and systems finally align with reality.
As the year closes, CWA is signing off briefly — with gratitude for the trust, collaboration, and support that has carried this work from idea to institution in such a short time. The pause is temporary. The momentum is not.
We’ll see you in 2026 — for a defining year at the Creative Women’s Association, and for a future where creative work is no longer invisible, informal, or expendable, but recognised as the economic force it has always been.
Read the Full Article:
Culture and creativity, skills building, and growth: what have we missed?
.
Designed with WordPress