Categories
Creative Business & Leadership Creative Capital Creative Survival Economic Independence & Women's Enterprise Field Notes, Observations & Case Studies In Real Life | IRL. Innovation & Ideas Insight Intermission Legacy & History Popular Culture, Women & the Creative Economy Power & Privilege Smart News Stories The Almanac The Future of Women's Work: Creative, Economic & Cultural Power Wellness Work & Money

This Is Not a Workforce Gap — It’s an Abyss

A national data review shows that 76% of unpaid labour performed by women creates an unmeasured economic abyss rather than a workforce gap. The CWA argues that Australia’s largest structural deficit is invisible creative and care labour, and proposes a certified creative workforce to transform and formalise this missing sector

 

It has become fashionable in policy circles to talk about the “workforce gap.” A neat little phrase. Painless. Contained. Manageable. A phrase that makes the structural crisis facing women sound like an HR inconvenience rather than what it actually is: an abyss. Not a gap, not a shortfall, not even a crisis — an immeasurably deep void carved over time, invisible from above because the drop is so steep the bottom cannot be seen or measured.

The dominant narrative runs like this: Australia has patchy workforce participation, women are “harder to engage,” childcare is expensive, creative industries are “unusual,” unpaid labour is “difficult to quantify.” These are the polite explanations. The surface-level observations that keep the national conversation comfortable. Because if the system admits what the numbers actually show, then governments, industries, and institutions would need to reckon with a truth they’ve avoided for decades: the modern economy is built upon a vast, unmeasured labour force — and it is almost entirely female.

And the data we do have barely scratches the surface. Page 2 of the CWA Data Dashboard shows that 76% of unpaid labour in Australia is performed by women and 71.8% of primary care is shouldered by women — a structural imbalance so large it rewrites the entire logic of workforce economics . Combined with the ABS Time Use Survey and Productivity Commission analysis, this is not indicative of a gap. It is proof of a nationwide debt. An economic shadow system so vast that traditional workforce modelling cannot even hold it. When women are absorbing the labour costs of the entire economy — domestic, emotional, educational, creative — the market isn’t just underpaying women; it is running on them like infrastructure.

The CWA lens cuts through the euphemisms. Women are not “underrepresented.” They are over-relied upon. They are structurally essential but systemically invisible. They are producing the labour the economy refuses to count. And creative professionals — the artists, educators, producers, cultural workers — are hit twice: undervalued as women and unrecognised as creatives. The data from the Creative Workforce Scoping Study reinforces this dual erasure: creative work has no national standards framework, no recognised pathways, no protected provenance, and exists almost entirely outside formal workforce planning (Dashboard, pp. 3–7) .

This is the abyss. A void so large, the absence becomes normalised. A professional universe where an entire population is working without recognition, without structure, without metrics — and therefore without power. And the tiny amount of data available doesn’t expose the depth of the problem; it only confirms its existence. The way a single flicker of sonar in deep water doesn’t map the trench — it merely proves the trench is there.

The reframe is blunt: If the gap were small, we could measure it. If it were moderate, we could model it. But when the void is this large — generational, embedded, unregulated, uncounted — the human eye cannot comprehend it and the economic system refuses to imagine it. Which is exactly why CWA exists. To measure it. To map it. To make the invisible visible. To convert an abyss into something that can be understood, and once understood, restructured.

And then — to fill it. Not with token programs or hobby pathways or small grants that make policymakers feel productive. But with a national standards framework, a certified creative workforce, a formalised skills ecosystem, and a protected provenance model similar to Harris Tweed’s Orb Mark — which transformed its entire regional economy (Dashboard, p.5) .

CWA is not building a program. It is building the missing architecture of an entire labour market. A market that already exists — women are already doing the work — but has never been recognised as such. And if we can bring this abyss back to a measurable gap, we will have done our job. If we can close the gap entirely, we will have changed history.

Read the Full Article:

Women Drive Economic Growth When We Remove These Systemic Barriers


Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading